Re: My understanding of the GFDL issue

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: My understanding of the GFDL issue
From: Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 08:48:44 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030830.084843.74751593.wlandry@ucsd.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 6b2a20a77cc3ae9346ac9145eedeaa53@Bouncing>
References: <[🔎] 32873.62.212.105.6.1062233205.squirrel@webmail.nerim.net> <[🔎] 6b2a20a77cc3ae9346ac9145eedeaa53@Bouncing>

MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> > I hope that Debian and the FSF will keep on discussing and working
> > together and some solution will be found in the middle run to satisfy
> > our users.
> 
> I agree.  I hope we can avoid this being seen as "News at 11: FSF vs
> Debian deathmatch" because it shouldn't become that.

The problem is that the FSF has made it clear that they are not going
to budge.  Debian has tried to work it out with them.  It is time to
act.

Regards,
Walter Landry
wlandry@ucsd.edu

Reply to:

References:
- My understanding of the GFDL issue
  - From: "Jérôme Marant" <jmarant@nerim.net>
- Re: My understanding of the GFDL issue
  - From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: GPL licenses and the "any later version" phrase (was: Re: A possible GFDL compromise)
Next by Date: Re: documentation eq software ?
Previous by thread: Re: My understanding of the GFDL issue
Next by thread: termcap status?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread