On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 10:32:40AM +0000, Dylan Thurston wrote: > In article <[🔎] 20030612212135.GF24352@deadbeast.net>, Branden Robinson wrote: > > 5) The freedom to retain privacy in one's person, effects, and data, > > including, but not limited to, all Works in one's possession and one's > > own changes to Works written by others. > > > > ... The point is that my usage of your Free Software does not > > entitle you to access to or any rights in my improvements to your > > software unless I distribute the Software back to you specifically. > > So do you intend to exclude the MPL with this? If I were dictator of Debian's licensing policy, yes. However, I am but one voice among many. I think the MPL is an instructive case, given how Mozilla's own licensing has evolved. -- G. Branden Robinson | There's nothing an agnostic can't Debian GNU/Linux | do if he doesn't know whether he branden@debian.org | believes in it or not. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Graham Chapman
Attachment:
pgpQQJ2Yg7PaD.pgp
Description: PGP signature