On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 04:53:03PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > > This point should probably be clarified. The reason PHP-Nuke was > > regarded as non-DFSG-free was because the author's additional > > restriction created, in our opinion, a license that was impossible to > > satisfy. > I thought that the reason was that the combined license is simply not > free, even if one interprets it in a self-consistent way. > > Debian interprets "this License" and "herein" to mean the conditions of > > the GNU GPL expressed in its text; no more and no less. > s/Debian/Branden Robinson/ Quite. I don't believe there was any consensus that the license was inconsistent, just that it was a) non-free, and b) not compatible with other GPL software. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpkmTiLPMq1U.pgp
Description: PGP signature