Re: Legal questions about some GNU Emacs files

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Legal questions about some GNU Emacs files
From: Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@free.fr>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 14:45:21 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] 1052311521.3eb8ffe17f1e4@imp.free.fr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030507064256.GX6476@deadbeast.net>
References: <87y91x6sji.fsf@marant.org> <20030428203908.GF23568@stonewall> <[🔎] 20030507064256.GX6476@deadbeast.net>

En réponse à Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>:

> 1) Documentation *is* software; and
> 2) The Debian Project treats documentation as software for the
> purposes
>    of interpreting our Social Contract and the Debian Free Software
>    Guidelines.
> 
> I do not believe the former.  I do believe the latter.

Can a manifesto be considered as documentation? And more
generaly, what about verbatiml texts?

--
Jérôme Marant <jerome@marant.org>
              <jerome.marant@free.fr>

http://marant.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Legal questions about some GNU Emacs files
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Droit d'auteur vs. free software?
Next by Date: Re: LPPL and non-discrimination
Previous by thread: Re: Legal questions about some GNU Emacs files
Next by thread: Re: Legal questions about some GNU Emacs files
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread