On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 06:59:45PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > One which isn't mentioned there is to amend the DFSG to allow the FDL and > similar licences. > > Before someone schedules a MOAB test over my home, note that I am not > advocating this course, merely that it should be mentioned and refuted. If > we don't do this, someone, somewhere is going to make the jump, and proceed > to pester the Project to death with questions about why we don't just modify > "that pesky ol' DFSG" and solve the problem that way. Sure, it's certainly worth addressing this point in the FAQ. It's a question that we're likely going to hear time and again: "Why should the FSF have to change? Why don't *you* change?" -- G. Branden Robinson | It's not a matter of alienating Debian GNU/Linux | authors. They have every right to branden@debian.org | license their software however we http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | like. -- Craig Sanders
Attachment:
pgpuqOIXSsd3Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature