On 2003-08-29 05:40:37 +0100 Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> wrote: > Here are the results of the survey. > > possible non- > developers developers developers > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > option 1 ("no") 18 3 22 > option 2 ("yes") 1 0 1 > option 3 ("sometimes") 8 4 4 > option 4 ("none of the above") 1 0 1 Here is the summary of your friendly local statistical analysis: I conclude that there is a probability of less than 1 in 1000 that the above total vote for option 1 would have been obtained by pure chance if there was no majority for option 1 over all others. I believe that common practice in matters of belief is to use a 10% level (ie, look for a probability of greater than 1 in 10). I assumed that the distribution is binomial and that the above is representative of possible voters. Technical details of the test: H_0 : p = 0.5 H_1 : p \gt 0.5 This is a one-tailed test. We are assuming a binomial distribution and have n=63 observations. $np=31.5 \gt 5$ and $np(1-p) = 15.75 \gt 5$, so we can approximate the binomial distribution with a normal distribution. Because the variance of the distribution under the null hypothesis is known, we perform a Z-test. At the 5% level, the critical region for a one-taled Z-test is Z > 1.96. At the 0.1% level, the region is Z > 3.291. The test statistic for the Z-test is $Z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sqrt{\sigma / n}}$, where $x$ is our obtained vote for option 1, so this is $Z = \frac{43 - 31.5}{\sqrt{15.75 / 63}} = \frac{11.5}{\sqrt{1/4}} = 23$. Clearly, this is greater than 3.291 and I reject $H_0$ in favour of $H_1$ on the basis of the evidence used. Notes: this test cannot be used safely to test for unanimity (ie H_0: p = 1) because it would violate assumptions for the normal approximation to the binomial. I cannot find a useful test of that for such small numbers of possible outcomes. My initial suggestion of chi-squared would have tested for a relationship between developer/non-developer and the option chosen, which might be interesting, but wasn't asked for. About the author: MJ Ray was awarded a Bachelor of Science degree in Mathematics with first class honours from the University of East Anglia in 1997, after studying the mathematics with statistics programme. He currently works as a consultant and performs statistical analysis as part of his work, but this is rather different to that, is unchecked and might be buggy, so he offers absolutely no warranty on it. He is a Debian developer and sometimes writes about himself in the third person. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ jabber://slef@jabber.at Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
RFC3156 defines security multipart formats for MIME with OpenPGP.
Attachment:
pgpLmOquZjAOq.pgp
Description: PGP signature