On Sun, 02 Mar 2003, Russell Nelson wrote:
> If you're on a desert island, and you have made them accessible to
> everyone you can reach, then you have complied with the terms of the
> license.
If that's what the writers of the RSPL intend, they have made it less
than clear. (So much so, that they're basically leaving it up to the
court system to deside what their license means.) Perhaps you should
suggest that they adopt a model of making source available similar to
the GPL?
> But more to the point, the law does not expect the impossible of you.
Can you provide a reference to case law where terms in a contract
similar to this have been decided one way or another? [And perferably
in multiple different jurisdictions?]
Don Armstrong
--
UF: What's your favourite coffee blend?
PD: Dark Crude with heavy water. You are understandink? "If geiger
counter does not click, the coffee, she is just not thick."
http://www.donarmstrong.com
http://www.anylevel.com
http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Attachment:
pgpqf5JL22aAn.pgp
Description: PGP signature