Re: ldp-es_20002103-7_i386.changes REJECTED
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 01:30:37PM -0600, David Starner wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 07:06:46PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > Iff the author authorised a
> > translation, the translation *can* be published under a different
> > license (DFSG free in the case) since the copyright holder is not the
> > original author, it's the translator.
>
> The translator and the author share copyright under copyright law. So
No they don't. Please read the Berne law. They can have their own
copyright.
> it's not the translator's unilateral choice what license to use. I don't
> debate the fact that the translation can have a different license from
> the original; it does concern me that the original authors may not have
> agreed with that copyright.
Why? Read the law.
Javi
Reply to: