Re: BSD license, core libraries, and NetBSD
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 09:51:18PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Thank you for that clarification. I'm not sure where that puts Debian,
> however, if the legality of this is based on the particulars of US law.
Well, the whole world is supposed to be obeying the US's copyright laws,
right? Something about "harmonization" and all that. :-P
http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2002/3mer/2mer/2001-0618.mer.aa.html
http://www.kryogenix.org/writings/tech/eucd
--
G. Branden Robinson | "To be is to do" -- Plato
Debian GNU/Linux | "To do is to be" -- Aristotle
branden@debian.org | "Do be do be do" -- Sinatra
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpHuPbyCje01.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to:
- References:
- BSD license, core libraries, and NetBSD
- From: "Joel Baker" <lucifer@lightbearer.com>
- Re: BSD license, core libraries, and NetBSD
- From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
- Re: BSD license, core libraries, and NetBSD
- From: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: BSD license, core libraries, and NetBSD
- From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
- Re: BSD license, core libraries, and NetBSD
- From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
- Re: BSD license, core libraries, and NetBSD
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
- Re: BSD license, core libraries, and NetBSD
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: BSD license, core libraries, and NetBSD
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>