Re: User's thoughts about LPPL
On Sun, 2002-07-21 at 04:20, Frank Mittelbach wrote:
> btw, would it be acceptable to you if LPPL would say,
>
> in case of modification you either
>
> - do what LPPL asks for now (i.e. rename ...), or
>
> - you keep the LaTeX package file name but replace
>
> \ProvidesPackage{varioref}
> [2000/08/22 v1.2g package for extended references (FMi)]
>
> by
>
> \ProvidesModifiedPackage{varioref}
> [2000/08/22 <your versioning info>]
> [2000/08/22 v1.2g package for extended references (FMi)] % that's the derived info
I don't see any problem with that. I assume LaTeX would provide
ProvidesModifiedPackage and do something to make it clear that the
package is not "official LaTeX", but would otherwise be equivalent to
ProvidesPackage.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: