AW: forwarded message from Jeff Licquia [OT]
True, that is why i said in b) LPPL-x (indicating a different version of
LPPL
okay?
cheers
frank (out of the run until tonight probably)
-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: Glenn Maynard [mailto:g_dlegal@zewt.org]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Juli 2002 09:37
An: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: forwarded message from Jeff Licquia [OT]
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 09:03:11AM +0200, Frank Mittelbach wrote:
> a) to improve LPPL (which has several deficiencies)
> b) to come to a common understanding that LPPL-x is complient with DFSG
as
> well as FSF etc
or failing b, b2) determine why the LPPL fails the DFSG, and what can be
done about it.
Don't assume a license is DFSG-free because you've read (or written) the
license, read the DFSG and ticked off each guideline. Human judgment
and existing practice come into the equation.
--
Glenn Maynard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: