Re: Non-US definition
Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net> writes:
> Previously Matt Kraai wrote:
> > * it contains cryptographic program code which needed to be
> > stored on a non-US server because of United States export
> > restrictions, or
>
> This is no longer true.
So how should people in like, France, act with regard to crypto? (I
guess the answer is "check on a package-by-package basis".)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: