Re: Bug#122929: wpoison, is it okay?
Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 12:00:46PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > >From tex.web:
>
> Do we even distribute TeX? We have packages for tetex, which claims
> to be GPLed. I didn't look very closely, though.
Tetex's license applies to the special tetex parts. Much of it is a
bunch of programs from many other sources, all free. tetex builds TeX
by automagically converting the Web source (really Pascal) into C and
then compiling that.
Thomas
Reply to:
- References:
- wpoison, is it okay?
- From: Robert Millan <zeratul2@wanadoo.es>
- Re: wpoison, is it okay?
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: wpoison, is it okay?
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Bug#122929: wpoison, is it okay?
- From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@iki.fi>
- Re: Bug#122929: wpoison, is it okay?
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Bug#122929: wpoison, is it okay?
- From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@iki.fi>
- Re: Bug#122929: wpoison, is it okay?
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Bug#122929: wpoison, is it okay?
- From: Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl>