On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:21:24AM +0000, Stephen Turner wrote: > The question of whether to change now to the GPL, or dual with GPL, is > different though, and I don't think it can be done. I would have to contact > all the contributing authors. But more seriously, analog includes code from > libraries under BSD-style licences with copyright clauses, which are not > GPL-compatible. (No, I can't just depend on the libraries being installed > and link to them, because analog is supposed to be OS-independent.) You mean advertising clauses, right? The old 4-clause BSD license? Just a BSD-style license with a copyright *notice* doesn't render something GPL-incompatible. -- G. Branden Robinson | I must despise the world which does Debian GNU/Linux | not know that music is a higher branden@debian.org | revelation than all wisdom and http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | philosophy. -- Ludwig van Beethoven
Attachment:
pgpbms1QZKcOJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature