Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text
tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> My point here is "this would be OK for Debian, right?" I intend to
> attempt to pull the wool over RMS's eyes (as if I could); just that
> this is a possible compromise. Rather than guess at what RMS would
> say, let's see what he actually does say (I've asked him).
Eek, what a horrid typo!
I meant "I intend no attempt to pull the wool over RMS's eyes".
T and N are right next to each other on my keyboard...
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text
- From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
- Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text
- From: Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu>
- Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: REVISED PROPOSAL regarding DFSG 3 and 4, licenses, and modifiable text
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)