Re: Splitting non-US into "crypto" and "patent" a good idea?

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Splitting non-US into "crypto" and "patent" a good idea?
From: jerome.marant@free.fr (Jérôme Marant)
Date: 12 Oct 2001 16:23:11 +0200
Message-id: <87d73t3pkg.fsf@marant.org>
In-reply-to: <20011012140805.K30885@wiggy.net>
References: <20011012135146.A3656@fenderson.com> <87het53q9s.fsf@marant.org> <20011012140805.K30885@wiggy.net>

Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net> writes:

> Previously J?r?me Marant wrote:
> >   IIRC, Debian does not provide patented software (no MP3 encoder,
> >   no DeCSS, etc).
> 
> We do. Look at gif handling code for example.

  I forgot about gif. Do you have any other examples?

-- 
Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@free.fr>
              <jerome@marant.org>

CV consultable à l'adresse :  http://marant.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Splitting non-US into "crypto" and "patent" a good idea?
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
- Re: Splitting non-US into "crypto" and "patent" a good idea?
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

References:
- Splitting non-US into "crypto" and "patent" a good idea?
  - From: Sunnanvind Briling Fenderson <sunnanvind@fenderson.com>
- Re: Splitting non-US into "crypto" and "patent" a good idea?
  - From: jerome.marant@free.fr (Jérôme Marant)
- Re: Splitting non-US into "crypto" and "patent" a good idea?
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Splitting non-US into "crypto" and "patent" a good idea?
Next by Date: Re: Splitting non-US into "crypto" and "patent" a good idea?
Previous by thread: Re: Splitting non-US into "crypto" and "patent" a good idea?
Next by thread: Re: Splitting non-US into "crypto" and "patent" a good idea?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread