Re: Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?)

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org, gaia@iki.fi
Subject: Re: Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?)
From: bruce@perens.com (Bruce Perens)
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 21:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] 19991023040408.5957644994D@perens.com>

On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 06:58:26PM -0500, David Starner wrote:
> Debian has not required documentation and other text documents to allow
> modifiaction to be in main. 

Barf with a spoon. Is that so?

	Bruce

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?)
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?)
  - From: "J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)" <jhm@cistron.nl>
- Re: Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?)
  - From: Joey Hess <joey@varesearch.com>

Prev by Date: proposed new /usr/share/doc/apt/copyright
Next by Date: Re: [harik@chaos.ao.net: Bug#47735: VIM includes encryption. Needs to become a non-US package.]
Previous by thread: Re: proposed new /usr/share/doc/apt/copyright
Next by thread: Re: Is haskell-doc acceptable in main? (was: Re: Is the GPL free?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread