Re: [Richard Braakman <dark@debian.org>] roxen-fonts-iso8859-1_0-1_i386.changes REJECTED
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [Richard Braakman <dark@debian.org>] roxen-fonts-iso8859-1_0-1_i386.changes REJECTED
- From: John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>
- Date: 30 Mar 1999 12:17:58 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87d81qrgdl.fsf@hasler.dhh>
- In-reply-to: martin@internet-treff.uni-koeln.de's message of "30 Mar 1999 19:39:18 +0200"
- References: <ygfbthclt1u.fsf@papadoc.solheim.net> <oalnggiyna.fsf@burrito.fake> <877ls0nu9r.fsf@pfaffben.user.msu.edu> <m10RzG1-0003m8C@haitech.martin.home> <87677ievji.fsf@pfaffben.user.msu.edu> <m10S2Tu-0003hiC@haitech.martin.home>
Martin writes:
> I have no knowledge, nor better information about copyright law
> what-so-ever. I just have this answer from idonex. I don't know if they
> are right or wrong. I just hope that their statment allows us to include
> the package.
Is there anyone out there who can wheedle an opinion on this out of an
attorney? I know nothing about the copyright law on fonts except that it
is weird.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Reply to: