On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 10:43:40AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Birzan George Cristian (gcbirzan@wolfheart.ro) [040305 20:55]: > > First of all, I would like to ask you to Cc: me to replies, as I am not > > subscribed to the list. Thanks in advance! > > > > Now, the reason I'm posting here is I've noticed the following claim > > made by nmap developers [1]: > > > > in accordance with section 4 of the GPL, we hereby terminate SCO's > > rights to redistribute any versions of Nmap in any of their products, > > including (without limitation) OpenLinux, Skunkware, OpenServer, and > > UNIXWare." > > > > IANAL, but I see two issues with this. > > Well, don't worry about that statement. It's either a policial > statement (also known as FUD) Only *false* statements can be FUD. This one is both political and true. (Doesn't affect the license though, it's just a reflection on how copyright works) -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature