Re: BSD Protection License
Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> writes:
> My MUA is fine; the thread was broken by the fact that I was
> replied to an email Adam sent me, and I CCed my reply to
> debian-legal.
It's considered impolite to reply in public to private mail.
> This email might break the thread again -- because I'm replying to
> an email which wasn't sent to me, by copying and pasting out of the
> list archives.
>
>> > I don't think that's necessary. Licenses are interpreted by
>> > "reasonable men";
>>
>>No. Licenses are interpreted by judges and/or juries.
>
> Judges and/or juries, who are assumed to be reasonable. I don't
Your assumption is false.
> see that there is any confusion inherent in a license which states
> "You may do X if Y. You may do X if Z"; but even if there was
> confusion, it is to be interpreted in a manner which makes sense.
You should read up on some court cases.
--
Måns Rullgård
mru@kth.se
Reply to: