Re: If not GFDL, then what?

[Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <edmundo@rano.org>]

Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>:

> If you feel that the GPL needs clarification for the term 'object code', add 
> a specific notice stating what forms you consider to be object code (not 
> source code) in your interpretation.

But make sure this "clarification" functions as an additional preamble
or an additional permission rather than as a patch to the GPL which
might create a new version of the GPL incompatible with other
versions.

Consider, for example, a case where two people write GPL
documentation, but one writes that the "source" must be in LaTeX and
the other writes that the "source" must be in Lout.