Re: GFDL and Anonymity --- another problem?
On 09 Oct 2003 17:49:36 +0200, Mathieu Roy <yeupou@gnu.org> said:
> [Funny to see how some people here are more interested in finding
> new issues before making any constructive proposal to fix the
> existing ones>
I have been reliably informed by the author of the license
that the development of GNU licenses is not a Debian issue, and as
such discussions about changes to the GFDL are not for the Debian
mailing lists. Given that, I would concentrate here on identifying
all perceived lacunae in the license that would affect any decisions
we make. If you are interested in changing the GFDL, please take it
to the appropriate list.
manoj
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200309/msg00825.html
--
Jim, this is Janelle. I'm flying tonight, so I can't make our date,
and I gotta find a safe place for Daffy. He loves you, Jim! It's
only two days, and you'll see. Great Danes are no problem! "The
Rockford Files"
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: