Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy

[tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)]

Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:

> Given there's more ambiguity in whether to apply the DFSG to documentation
> than there is in whether the GFDL passes the DFSG, it seemed most
> sensible just to exempt documentation from the DFSG for sarge; so that's
> the policy.

I don't think there is any ambiguity.

However, if there really is a real hope that the FSF will actually
make its manuals DFSG-free, then I don't mind skating for a little
longer.