Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Russell" == Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com> writes:
>
> Russell> Nahhh. I'm just reading Bruce's commentary to you. He
> Russell> edited Debian's members words into the DFSG. Do you
> Russell> think he was wrong about the intent of the
> Russell> no-discrimination clause?
>
> Russell> I like the no-discrimination clause. It's worked very
> Russell> well. You just don't see any software anymore that says
> Russell> "Free for educational and personal use; government and
> Russell> commercial users must license it." But don't go
> Russell> over-reading it like you've been doing.
>
> Do you have primary source material for the original meaning of this
> clause? It would be very useful to bring up from time to time in
> discussions.
It's available in the debian-private archives.
--
see shy jo, wishing again we had some way to bring those threads
back into the light of day
Attachment:
pgpblGmM52gcY.pgp
Description: PGP signature