Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Cc: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@logic.univie.ac.at>
Subject: Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?
From: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jsogo@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 23:21:01 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021002212101.GB8126@jaimedelamo.eu.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian-legal@lists.debian.org, Andreas Metzler <ametzler@logic.univie.ac.at>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021002142544.GA9999@balrog.logic.univie.ac.at>
References: <[🔎] 20021002142544.GA9999@balrog.logic.univie.ac.at>

On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 04:25:45PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Perhaps Debian could solve this issue once and forever by paying 250
> Euros to libedc_ecc's author, Heiko Eißfeldt?

  No.

  It's not the same to pay money to recover a proyect like Blender than
  to recover a little piece of software like this. As it's said here:

  http://www.mail-archive.com/cdwrite@other.debian.org/msg03407.html

  a GPL replacement could be written quite easy.

  And as Adreas Muller says here:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/cdwrite@other.debian.org/msg03415.html

  he's going to write a replacement for that tool in some weeks.

-- 
  Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
     jsogo@debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?
  - From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>

References:
- cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?
  - From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@logic.univie.ac.at>

Prev by Date: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?
Next by Date: Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?
Previous by thread: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?
Next by thread: Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread