Quoting Justin B Rye (jbr@edlug.org.uk): > Christian Perrier wrote: > > While our i18n.debian.net server was down, several packages got > > new|modified debconf templates (of course without any call for > > translations by their respective maintainers...): > > [...] > > |redhat-cluster | | 0/0/4 | > [...] > > I notice the control file patch from last year's review of RHCS v2.x > (http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-english/2007/12/msg00085.html > leading to bugreport #461839) hasn't been applied; for instance the > package description for gfs-tools v3.x still talks about "high > available services". I haven't checked yet (RHCS is a huge package) but I also suspect that something hasn't been properly applied somewhere.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature