[RFR] templates://moon-buggy/moon-buggy.templates, moon-buggy-esd.templates
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Here is a proposed review (both new files and patch).
Now we're in review mode I'll amend the Subject.
> - The directory /var/lib/games will not be deleted (although the package
> - maintainer thinks it should be deleted when empty).
> + The /var/lib/games directory should probably be deleted later on.
Was this about bug #109936/109960/109979/110058?
If so, what's stopping you doing what you think you should? I don't
see anybody in those bug-logs telling you you shouldn't delete it
when empty; they only said you should check first. Oh, and the
submitter of #109960 wondered whether maybe there might be a reason
to leave it, but without going so far as to actually suggest one.
> Template: moon-buggy-esd/sound_hardware
> Type: boolean
> _Description: Do you have sound hardware installed?
> + The moon-buggy-esd package will only work properly if some sound
> + hardware is available (see Bug #76059).
> + .
> + If you want to use moon-buggy without
> + sound hardware, you should use the moon-buggy package.
This whole thing looks pretty pointless - if this debconf question
was going to exist anywhere I'd expect it to belong to esound.
Still, that's all outside the jurisdiction of a template review.
Christian's version looks fine.
Are we touching the control file? If so, the only thing I notice
there is the short description(s):
Description: Drive a car across the moon
That's a capitalised verb phrase; more DevRef6.2.2-compliant options
include:
Description: game where you drive a car across the moon
Description: simple car-driving game set on the moon
Description: lunar rover driving game
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
Reply to: