Hi, On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:46:23AM +0100, Arnaud Patard wrote: > Simon Guinot <simon@sequanux.org> writes: > > > Hi, > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:08:06PM +0100, Arnaud Patard wrote: > >> Simon Guinot <simon@sequanux.org> writes: > >> Hi, > >> > >> > Package: linux-2.6 > >> > Version: 3.1.6-1 > >> > Severity: important > >> > > >> > Dear Maintainer, > >> > > >> > The kernel image provided by package linux-image-3.1.0-1-kirkwood don't > >> > support the LaCie Kirkwood boards. > >> > > >> > Please, consider applying the following patch: > >> > > >> > diff --git a/config/armel/config.kirkwood b/config/armel/config.kirkwood > >> > index 1eae313..85b0c64 100644 > >> > --- a/config/armel/config.kirkwood > >> > +++ b/config/armel/config.kirkwood > >> > @@ -63,6 +63,12 @@ CONFIG_MACH_DOCKSTAR=y > >> > CONFIG_MACH_OPENRD_BASE=y > >> > CONFIG_MACH_OPENRD_CLIENT=y > >> > CONFIG_MACH_OPENRD_ULTIMATE=y > >> > +CONFIG_MACH_NETSPACE_V2=y > >> > +CONFIG_MACH_INETSPACE_V2=y > >> > +CONFIG_MACH_NETSPACE_MAX_V2=y > >> > +CONFIG_MACH_D2NET_V2=y > >> > +CONFIG_MACH_NET2BIG_V2=y > >> > +CONFIG_MACH_NET5BIG_V2=y > >> > CONFIG_MACH_T5325=y > >> > > >> > ## > >> > @@ -172,6 +178,11 @@ CONFIG_GPIO_SYSFS=y > >> > # CONFIG_DRM is not set > >> > > >> > ## > >> > +## file: drivers/hwmon/Kconfig > >> > +## > >> > +CONFIG_SENSORS_GPIO_FAN=m > >> > + > >> > +## > >> > ## file: drivers/i2c/Kconfig > >> > ## > >> > CONFIG_I2C=y > >> > @@ -244,6 +255,8 @@ CONFIG_ISDN_DIVAS_MAINT=m > >> > CONFIG_NEW_LEDS=y > >> > CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS=y > >> > CONFIG_LEDS_GPIO=y > >> > +CONFIG_LEDS_NS2=y > >> > +CONFIG_LEDS_NETXBIG=y > >> > CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS=y > >> > CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_TIMER=y > >> > CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_DEFAULT_ON=y > >> > >> Does this really need to be built-in ? (side note: if it can't work as > >> module, why is it a tristate and not a boolean in kernel config ?) > > > > No it doesn't. I should have configured them as modules. > > ok. I've enabled the devices in svn for 3.2. Thanks. > > > > By the way, why is the driver leds-gpio built-in ? > > > > There may be various reason, but I've no idea why. > > >> > >> Also, do you plan to add support for them into d-i (unless it's already > >> done) ? > > > > Note that the having d-i support is not mandatory to run Debian on a > > LaCie NAS. Please, let's fix the kernel support. On my side, I will have > > a look at the Debian installer as quickly as possible (knowing that I am > > quite busy this days). > > I didn't want to imply that d-i support was needed to enable the > devices. I was thinking it would be a nice addition to this change in > the kernel package. Indeed and I will take care of this. Simon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature