On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:35:16 +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012, 11:29:57 schrieb Markus Kolb:Is it really a broken union descriptor? There is all information but the original cdc_ether code can only handle union descriptor which starts with 0. That is something e.g. the Windows driver can handle.Possibly cdc-ether is also broken, but the descriptor refers to interfaces4 and 5 which don't exist. Regards Oliver
Ok. You're right, I've reminded. Is there another way to get the correct interface numbers or is the defensive guess of my patch ok?