On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 19:59 -0700, Brian Churchwell wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 01:24 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > We've always built ecryptfs as a module, and I don't see why we should > change that. > > Ben. > > -------- > > I was enlightened by > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590081 > > Now that I understand that this is expected behavior on Debian, is there > a place that I could help document this? This will likely come up again > as no ecryptfs instructions that I find include this information. Perhaps ecryptfs-utils should install an init script that loads the module. In any case, it should be auto-loaded for people that want to use it, and not for those that don't! I'll reassign this to ecryptfs-utils. Ben.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part