Re: Possibility of getting openvz problem included in stable?

["Ola Lundqvist" <ola@inguza.com>]

Hi Maks and Kir

Kir: Some updated statement from Maks.

Maks: I think one reason for not updating is that the version in  
Debian stable is usually not updated. So it is hard to tell what  
revision the Debian kernel team is regarding stable updates.

// Ola

Quoting "maximilian attems" <max@stro.at>:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:23:01AM +0000, maximilian attems wrote:
> > Hi ola,
> >
> > my patience for openvz is currently gone from epsilon to zero.
> >
> > see
> > http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.32-openvz;a=summary
> >
> > and in contrary
> > http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel4/023stab054.1
>
> wrong c&p, meant of course,
> see how happily that tree is maintained regularly:
> http://wiki.openvz.org/Download/kernel/rhel6/042stab017.1
>
> > They *don't* update their git tree.
> > come on 2.6.32.28 is very old stable compared to 2.6.32.41
> >
> > So if you might get them to push their RH fixes and updated
> > stable trees to their git 2.6.32, the situation might be different.



--
 --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology ----
/  ola@inguza.com                    Annebergsslingan 37        \
|  opal@debian.org                   654 65 KARLSTAD            |
|  http://inguza.com/                Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9  /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------