Your message dated Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:26:23 +0000 with message-id <1298208383.2211.179.camel@localhost> and subject line Re: Processed: Udev failure on alpha because of missing inotify in -generic has caused the Debian Bug report #614172, regarding Please provide dist-upgradable kernel with inotify for udev on alpha to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 614172: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614172 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: udev: Upgrade in sid (alpha) fails (inotfy required?)
- From: Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de>
- Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:28:24 +0100
- Message-id: <20110219172824.GA15143@Debian-50-lenny-64-minimal>
Package: udev Version: 166-1 Severity: important Uptodate sid (apt-get dist-ugprade). axpitp:~# LC_ALL=C apt-get install udev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done udev is already the newest version. The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libgnome-keyring-dev libio-compress-base-perl libsmbclient libpopt-dev .... libpolkit2 libaudiofile0 Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 2 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y Setting up udev (166-1) ... error initializing inotify Cannot start udevd. (rc=4) dpkg: error processing udev (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 4 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of udisks: udisks depends on udev; however: Package udev is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing udisks (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured configured to not write apport reports configured to not write apport reports Errors were encountered while processing: udev udisks E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: alpha Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-alpha-generic Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages udev depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.38 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6.1 2.11.2-11 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libselinux1 2.0.96-1 SELinux runtime shared libraries ii libudev0 166-1 libudev shared library ii libusb-0.1-4 2:0.1.12-17 userspace USB programming library ii lsb-base 3.2-27 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip ii util-linux 2.17.2-9.1 Miscellaneous system utilities Versions of packages udev recommends: ii pciutils 1:3.1.7-7 Linux PCI Utilities ii usbutils 1:001-1 Linux USB utilities udev suggests no packages. -- debconf information: udev/new_kernel_needed: false udev/title/upgrade: udev/reboot_needed: udev/sysfs_deprecated_incompatibility: -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann debian@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 614172-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Processed: Udev failure on alpha because of missing inotify in -generic
- From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:26:23 +0000
- Message-id: <1298208383.2211.179.camel@localhost>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] handler.s.C.12981819931026.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
- References: <20110220060623.GB6956@Debian-50-lenny-64-minimal> <[🔎] handler.s.C.12981819931026.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 06:09 +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > > > clone 614099 -1 > Bug#614099: udev: Upgrade in sid (alpha) fails (inotfy required?) > Bug 614099 cloned as bug 614172. > > > reassign -1 linux-2.6 > Bug #614172 [udev] udev: Upgrade in sid (alpha) fails (inotfy required?) > Bug reassigned from package 'udev' to 'linux-2.6'. > Bug No longer marked as found in versions udev/166-1. > > found -1 2.6.32-trunk-alpha-generic > Bug #614172 [linux-2.6] udev: Upgrade in sid (alpha) fails (inotfy required?) > There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.32-trunk-alpha-generic' with architecture '' > Unable to make a source version for version '2.6.32-trunk-alpha-generic' > Bug Marked as found in versions 2.6.32-trunk-alpha-generic. > > retitle -1 Please provide dist-upgradable kernel with inotify for udev on alpha > Bug #614172 [linux-2.6] udev: Upgrade in sid (alpha) fails (inotfy required?) > Changed Bug title to 'Please provide dist-upgradable kernel with inotify for udev on alpha' from 'udev: Upgrade in sid (alpha) fails (inotfy required?)' We do enable inotify on alpha and did so back in 2.6.32 as well. benh@albeniz:~$ uname -r 2.6.32-bpo.5-alpha-generic benh@albeniz:~$ grep sys_inotify_init /proc/kallsyms fffffc00010e7c90 T sys_inotify_init fffffc00010e7cc0 T sys_inotify_init1 Whatever the problem is, it doesn't seem to be in the kernel. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---