On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 13:52 +0200, Jonathan Protzenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the quick reply! I'm amazed.
>
> I cannot use your pre-built amd64 module because I'm not at work
> anymore, and although I still have my phone with me, the machine I'm
> using is a 686 now.
There is also a 686 build in the same place.
> I cannot apply your patch either. I'm running testing, and the
> rndis_host.c file looks like this:
>
> int rndis_command(struct usbnet *dev, struct rndis_msg_hdr *buf, int buflen)
> {
> struct cdc_state *info = (void *) &dev->data;
> int master_ifnum;
> int retval;
> unsigned count;
> __le32 rsp;
> u32 xid = 0, msg_len, request_id;
>
> Which is obviously not what you diff'd against (the patch fails in this
> area).
[...]
I think you're looking at the unpatched source. You can use the
debian/bin/test-patches script to apply the new patch.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part