[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#606520: linux-tools-2.6.36: /usr/bin/perf_2.6.36 links against openssl but copyright lists only GPLv2 without exceptions



Package: linux-tools-2.6.36
Version: 2.6.36-1~experimental.1
Severity: serious

/usr/share/doc/linux-tools-2.6.36/copyright gives me the impression
that we have a license to distribute /usr/bin/perf_2.6.36 only under
the terms of the GPLv2. Is this correct?

It seems that perf_2.6.36 uses openssl:

$ ldd /usr/bin/perf_2.6.36|grep ssl
        libssl.so.0.9.8 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 (0x00007f20fad1f000)

Has perf upstream given an exception to GPLv2 to allow us to do this
or is this indeed a real problem?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages linux-tools-2.6.36 depends on:
ii  binutils                2.20.1-15        The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  libc6                   2.11.2-7         Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libelf1                 0.148-1          library to read and write ELF file
ii  libperl5.10             5.10.1-16        shared Perl library
ii  libpython2.6            2.6.6-6          Shared Python runtime library (ver
ii  perl                    5.10.1-16        Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  python                  2.6.6-3+squeeze1 interactive high-level object-orie
ii  python-support          1.0.10           automated rebuilding support for P

Versions of packages linux-tools-2.6.36 recommends:
ii  linux-base       2.6.36-1~experimental.1 Linux image base package

Versions of packages linux-tools-2.6.36 suggests:
pn  linux-doc-2.6.36              <none>     (no description available)

-- no debconf information



Reply to: