[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#595502: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley: panics while loading INIT, IOMMU out of mapping resources



On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 02:03:01PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 13:10 +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Thibaut VARÈNE <varenet@debian.org> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley
> >> >>>>>>> Version: 2.6.32-20
> >> >>>>>>> Severity: grave
> >> >>>>>>> Justification: renders system unusable
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> System boots fine with linux-image-2.6.32-3-mckinley 2.6.32-9.
> >> >>>>>>> Panics with 2.6.32-20 with: I/O MMU @ c0000000fed01000 is out of
> >> >>>>>>> mapping
> >> >>>>>>> resources
> >>
> >> FWIW, this bug still affects 2.6.32-27, and renders the system
> >> completely unusable.
> >> I've had to stick with 2.6.32-9 so far.
> >
> > Note that dann no longer works for HP, which probably makes it quite
> > hard for him to do IA64 testing.
> >
> > Since you apparently still haven't tested Linux 2.6.35, we're waiting
> > for you to do that.  Actually, make that 2.6.36 now.
> 
> As expected, 2.6.36.1 from experimental fucked up my raid
> "gracefully", just as 2.6.35-21 did. I'm so very very happy right now,
> thank you. Needless to say, I'm not "testing" any other kernel on that
> machine. I suppose ia64 has porters, too?
[...]

Given that this bug still exists in 2.6.36, you can report a bug upstream at
<https://bugzilla.kernel.org>.  We will be happy to backport any fix if
possible.  Let us know the upstream bug number or URL so we can track it.

I'm afraid Linux on IA64 is pretty much dead, though.  Most of these machines
are running HP-UX and the commercial Linux distributions have dropped it.  I
would expect and support removal from Debian release architectures after
"squeeze".

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
                                                              - Albert Camus



Reply to: