[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#481684: marked as done (Please enable CONFIG_LATENCYTOP so we can use the latencytop tool)



Your message dated Tue, 2 Nov 2010 20:18:30 +0800
with message-id <AANLkTin+E9bfWUjfhrZi_-giqwugqmLy2YaB5xHLjPfD@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#600935: [linux-2.6] Please consider to enable CONFIG_LATENCYTOP
has caused the Debian Bug report #600935,
regarding Please enable CONFIG_LATENCYTOP so we can use the latencytop tool
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
600935: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600935
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
Version: 2.6.25-3
Severity: normal

Hi,

please consider enabling CONFIG_LATENCYTOP in the kernel, as it's needed
for the 'latencytop' utility to work. latencytop itself is already in
unstable. See also http://latencytop.org/.

The current kernels have
  CONFIG_HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT=y
  # CONFIG_LATENCYTOP is not set
but both options are needed.

I must admit I do _not_ know if there are any negative effects when
enabling that setting. However, I have rebuilt my kernel
(Debian 2.6.25-3 version) with CONFIG_LATENCYTOP and it _did_ make
latencytop work fine for me.


Thanks, Uwe.
-- 
http://www.hermann-uwe.de  | http://www.holsham-traders.de
http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> You misunderstand.  We do not enable debugging options that will hurt
> performance for most users.  This has nothing to do with providing debug
> information, which is provided in separate packages and has a minimal
> effect on the kernel image packages.
>
Thanks, close this bug.

--
Liang Guo
http://bluestone.cublog.cn


--- End Message ---

Reply to: