* maximilian attems <max@stro.at> [Wed Jun 09, 2010 at 04:25:09AM +0200]: > On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 03:47:59PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > > * Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com> [Son Aug 10, 2008 at 05:03:28 +0200]: > > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 04:35:23PM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain wrote: > > > > I've just read through bts #409271 :"initramfs-tools: NFSv4 not > > > > supported for root fs" > > > > and I'm interrested in knowing the status of this bug for lenny. > > > AFAIK my understanding is: klibc's mount doesn't support NFSv4, initramfs > > > insists on using klibc's mount, stalemate. > > maks, we should discuss this issue in further details, > > we be great if we could resolve this in time for squeeze. > in a week i'm a back, but this is over ambitious. Fair enoug,. though if we have a conclusion regarding klibc<->libc<->busybox... solving this problem might not be that much work. But yeah, let's discuss that when you're back. thanks && regards, -mika-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature