tags 550320 + moreinfo thanks * maximilian attems <max@stro.at> [Mit Mär 24, 2010 at 12:10:31 +0100]: > On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Peng Tao wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Peng Tao <bergwolf@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:36 PM, maximilian attems <max@stro.at> wrote: > > >> thanks, please add > > >> ldd /bin/busybox > > > $ldd initrd/bin/busybox > > > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff9bfff000) > > > libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007f73aa83a000) > > > libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f73aa4e7000) > > > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f73aaabd000) > > Just noticed that I should do: > > $ldd /bin/busybox > > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff8e1ff000) > > libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007ff6c3af0000) > > libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007ff6c379d000) > > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007ff6c3d73000) > > although the results are same. > sorry for late reply, can you still reproduce aboves? > what is ls -l /lib64/libc.so.6 > if it is a symlink please provide output of > readlink -f /lib64/libc.so.6 > and the ls -l of the target, so > ls -l $( readlink -f /lib64/libc.so.6 ) Hi Peng, any news on that? Can you please test current initramfs-tools version (>= 0.95.1) and let us know whether you still explore this issue? regards, -mika-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature