On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 20:37 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 06:49:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 18:34 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote: > > > > This became a discussion about the general kernel packaging and how we > > > > might use the upstream provided facilities better. There was some > > > > discussion we have way too many ways to build a kernel. > > > > > > > > A general agreement was reached that "make-kpkg" should go away as > > > > it is no longer adequately maintained. Action item for Vince to tell > > > > Manoj it is deprecated and thank him for his contribution. > > > > > > What will be the recommended way to package locally built kernels in a > > > .deb? At the moment, it looks like kernel-package will be a real loss > > > for Debian users. > > > > make deb-pkg > > >From the official Debian kernel-tree? How is one working if one uses > the vanilla kernel? You didn't try it, did you? ;-) Ben. -- Ben Hutchings It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part