[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#392126: marked as done (`kernel: eth%%d: NE2000 found at': Is this a matter of not using register_netdev?)

Your message dated Sat, 27 Dec 2008 14:58:11 +0100
with message-id <20081227135811.GA10383@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: `kernel: eth%%d: NE2000 found at': Is this a matter of not using register_netdev?
has caused the Debian Bug report #392126,
regarding `kernel: eth%%d: NE2000 found at': Is this a matter of not using register_netdev?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
392126: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=392126
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: linux-source-2.6.17
Version: 2.6.17-9
Severity: normal

  Log has

    kernel: eth%%d: NE2000 found at 

Is this a matter of not using register_netdev?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-9.pentium3.1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 03:40:55AM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote:
> I can't tell if/when the problem is solved with recent kernel version. 
> It has been a long time since I used that hardware. I don't remember what was the last
> kernel version that I did had with that hardware, and whether it still had the problem.

Thanks, closing the bug then.

Cheers,
        Moritz

--- End Message ---
Reply to: