Bug#258043: status update
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 05:02:31PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 11:20 +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Sure, though you might want to make some scope for other patches,
> > as I know they creep in from time to time. For instance, sometimes
> > we end up with security patches that are missing upstream, of corse
> > we submit them, and they usually get incoporated.
>
> Good idea. Do you think this statement is properly scoped?
>
> This source closely tracks official linux kernel releases.
> Modifications to that source consist of security fixes, bug fixes, and
> features that have already been accepted by the upstream maintainers, or
> are changes we believe will be accepted upstream in some form.
>
> The "in some form" is kinda hand-wavy - but I couldn't think of better
> wording - suggestions welcome.
>
> If this sounds ok, (and since there is no other pending feedback), I'll
> plan to make this change to the Description and close this bug.
That sounds fine to me.
hand-wavy is ok, because its a guideline.
--
Horms
Reply to: