Re: Bug#333858: Proposed improved patch for yaird
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 01:52:59PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:43:10 +0200
> Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
>
> > > I will fix this bug but not use time on switching to SVN this
> > > weekend.
> >
> > I commited the package to svn, added the patch, fixed the manpage
> > accordyingly, and added the provides, so from me, the packages is
> > ready to be uploaded. The svn repo is currently at :
> >
> > (alioth svn+ssh checkouts)
> > svn+ssh://<user>@svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/trunk/utils/yaird
> > (anonymous checkouts)
> > svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/trunk/utils/yaird
> >
> > Hope this is helpful and i didn't do something stupid.
>
> Hm. I think you did, actually: The reason I hesitated adding yaird to
> SVN is that it is not a Debian-native package, so I believe it makes
> better sense only to maintain the debian subdir here and use a virgin
> tarball from upstream.
Well, this is nothing problematic, it can be changed still, that said, Erik
seemed interested in maintaining it inside svn on alioth, but maybe he meant a
separate repo ?
> I am relatively new to that approach and had help making awstats
> group-maintained that way. So I wanted to make an excercise out of
> this, figuring out exactly how to set it up, also for setting up
> group-maintainance of the remaining 40 packages of "mine".
Hehe, well, you can still ignore what i did (or move it aside or something)
and do it like you intented :)
> And also, I suggested an improved patch, and wanted to hold my breath
> until later today for comments from Erik before deciding if I want to
> take my chances and use that or the earlier one from him.
Well, revision control system are for holding most of the changes, it is not
as if i NMUed the package or somethign :)
I just needed something to test the kernel-package changes, so ...
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: