Bug#330406: marked as done (Buildinfo.gz: shorter uncompressed)
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:52:00 +0900
with message-id <20051014035159.GA11941@verge.net.au>
and subject line Buildinfo.gz: shorter uncompressed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2005 22:02:52 +0000
>From jidanni@jidanni.org Tue Sep 27 15:02:50 2005
Return-path: <jidanni@jidanni.org>
Received: from frodo.hserus.net [204.74.68.40]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EKNXF-0004aw-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:02:49 -0700
Received: from tc218-187-20-165.dialup.dynamic.apol.com.tw ([218.187.20.165]:3510 helo=jidanni1)
by frodo.hserus.net with esmtpsa
(Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.52 #0)
id 1EKNXC-000Fkz-Qo by authid <jidanni> with plain
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:32:48 +0530
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please
Subject: Buildinfo.gz: shorter uncompressed
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:56:32 +0800
Message-Id: <E1EKLZ2-0001qS-Cm@jidanni1>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: linux-doc-2.6.12
Version: 2.6.12-2
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/doc/linux-doc-2.6.12/Buildinfo.gz
I notice this file would be shorter uncompressed.
$ f=/usr/share/doc/linux-doc-2.6.12/Buildinfo.gz
$ zcat $f|wc -c - $f
51 -
81 /usr/share/doc/linux-doc-2.6.12/Buildinfo.gz
P.S., what I was looking for was the file that would tell me if the
2.6.12-1 was built with e.g., CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS turned on or not.
P.P.S., README.Debian.gz still refers to kernel-doc-X.X.XX
Also grep ' $' will spot some wasted trailing blanks there, as can be
found in many upstream files too. They are quite striking with emacs'
show-trailing-whitespace enabled.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 330406-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2005 04:40:41 +0000
>From horms@koto.vergenet.net Thu Oct 13 21:40:41 2005
Return-path: <horms@koto.vergenet.net>
Received: from koto.vergenet.net [210.128.90.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQHN2-0008AY-00; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:40:40 -0700
Received: by koto.vergenet.net (Postfix, from userid 7100)
id 6CE2D34057; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:39:41 +0900 (JST)
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:52:00 +0900
From: Horms <horms@debian.org>
To: 330406-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Buildinfo.gz: shorter uncompressed
Message-ID: <20051014035159.GA11941@verge.net.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Cluestick: seven
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: 330406-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
It is common practice to compress all documents,
actually I think it is policy. In any case,
it makes little sense to make a exceptions
on a case by case basis, rather than consistently
gzip -9 int all documents as is the current situation.
--
Horms
Reply to: