On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:13:46AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > For 2.6, instead of building it as an outside package, > perhaps it should be an i386 subarch or flavour within the linux-2.6 > package? Yes. > it could just as > easily be another i386 flavour (I believe the current linux-2.6 packaging > supports the cross-compilation stuff necessary to override ARCH=um?). Only if kernel-package sees this as a i386 subarch. But it is an easy fix. > According to the sf uml page, past 2.6.9, a separate patch is not needed > for uml. What about the skas patch, was a version of that ever merged > into 2.6? SKAS is for the host and was never merged. Bastian -- I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth. -- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3198.9
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature