Re: linux-2.6_2.6.12-2_i386.changes REJECTED
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:18:20PM -0700, Debian Installer wrote:
>
> Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in testing >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in stable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in testing >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in stable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in testing >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in stable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in testing >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-k7_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in stable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in unstable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in testing >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
> Rejected: kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.12-2_i386.deb: old version (101) in stable >= new version (2.6.12-2) targeted at unstable.
I guess we need an epoch
--
Horms
Reply to: