Bug#266609: marked as done (initrd lacks support for root device on SATA)
Your message dated Tue, 17 May 2005 17:32:25 +0200
with message-id <20050517153225.GG12806@sputnik.stro.at>
and subject line (fwd) Re: initrd-tools: doesn't probe sata devices
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2004 11:27:12 +0000
>From eric@alterna.homelinux.org Wed Aug 18 04:27:12 2004
Return-path: <eric@alterna.homelinux.org>
Received: from 80-28-166-153.adsl.nuria.telefonica-data.net (femto.alterna.homelinux.org) [80.28.166.153]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BxOb2-0003N0-00; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 04:27:12 -0700
Received: from eric by femto.alterna.homelinux.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BxOaw-00030X-00; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:27:06 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eric Van Buggenhaut <ericvb@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: installation-reports: [i386] [rc1] [netinst] reboot fails on SATA root
partition
Reply-To: Eric.VanBuggenhaut@AdValvas.be
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:27:06 +0200
Message-Id: <E1BxOaw-00030X-00@femto.alterna.homelinux.org>
Sender: Eric Van Buggenhaut <eric@alterna.homelinux.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: <Fill in date and from where you got the image>
uname -a: <The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt>
Date: <Date and time of the install>
Method: <How did you install? What did you boot off? If network
install, from where? Proxied?>
Machine: i386
Processor: p4 2,8GHZ
Memory: 512MB
Root Device: SATA
Root Size/partition table: <Feel free to paste the full partition
table, with notes on which partitions are mounted where.>
Output of lspci:
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [E]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [E]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
I installed rc1 using the businesscard iso. Booted expert26.
You guys made an impressive work but there are still some problems:
- Most important, my root device is a SATA disk. Although the installer correctly loads the module and partition the disk, when rebooting after base installed, the boot sequence crashes, because it is unable to find a root partition. I guess this is because the sata_promise kernel module isn't compiled in the kernel but rather as a loadable module and thus the kernel needs to mount / to load the module and to load the module it needs to mount / first. The same chicken/egg problem that happens with loadable scsi modules.
Do you have any fix for this ? Wouldn't it be better to have SATA support compiled in the kernel ?
How can I get my system to boot now ?
Now the less important stuff:
- I was unable to choose Belgian keyboard, the installer says that such a layout isn't available
- At the partition stage, I was unable to do the 'Manual Partitioning' clicking on that menu kept dropping me back at the previous menu. I tried partitioning from the console at Alt-F2 but never found out the device files. After digging around for a bit, I realized the devices files are now in /dev/ide. This is confusing and would probably need a help message: when booting the 2.4 installer image, my hard disk is at /dev/hde and when booting a 2.6 it is at /dev/ide/bus0/...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=fr_BE@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE@euro (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_BE@euro)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 266609-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 2005 15:32:29 +0000
>From max@stro.at Tue May 17 08:32:29 2005
Return-path: <max@stro.at>
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DY43Z-00076V-00; Tue, 17 May 2005 08:32:29 -0700
Received: from sputnik (stallburg.stro.at [128.131.216.190])
by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5A55C010
for <266609-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 17 May 2005 17:32:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DY43V-0001XH-Kk
for 266609-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 17 May 2005 17:32:25 +0200
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 17:32:25 +0200
From: maximilian attems <debian@sternwelten.at>
To: 266609-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: (fwd) Re: initrd-tools: doesn't probe sata devices
Message-ID: <20050517153225.GG12806@sputnik.stro.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Delivered-To: 266609-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
your bug should be fixed by newer initrd-tools in sarge
as of version 0.1.76.
please reopen if pain subsits.
thanks
--
makx
Reply to: