[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Kernel Security Updates for Sarge



On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 01:27:55AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:07:06AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Horms wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > For reference, these are the architectues that I believe
> > > the kernel team handles, and the version of the kernel source
> > > they are using in Sarge:
> 
> > >                 Base kernel source version of package in Sarge
> > > 2.4.27: alpha      kernel-tree-2.4.27-9   (seems to be out of date in SVN)
> > >         hppa       kernel-tree-2.4.27-8
> > >         i386       kernel-tree-2.4.27-8
> > >         ia64       kernel-tree-2.4.27-8
> > >         mips       kernel-tree-2.4.27-8   (versioned dependancy needs to be
> > >                                            changed to kernel-tree-2.4.27-8)
> 
> > mips/mipsel uses the kernel-source package as build dependency
> > instead of kernel-tree.
> 
> > [snip]
> > > The changelogs that I would like you to look at are as follows.
> > > Almost all of the changes will be in kernel-source, and I believe 
> > > that the log is accurate. There are also changelogs for each
> > > architecture, but these are generally just packaging and kernel-config
> > > changes:
> > [snip]
> > >   mips: version in Sarge: 2.4.27-8.040815-1
> > >   http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/kernel/trunk/kernel-2.4/mips/kernel-patch-2.4.27-mips-2.4.27/debian/changelog?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
> 
> > mips/mipsel has four additional changes which should go in sarge:
> > - Fix broken ptrace
> > - Fix Cobalt PCI bridge initialisation
> > - Work around crashes on Cobalt under I/O load
> > - Fix crash on startup on serial-less Cobalts
> 
> All of which seem to be out of scope in a discussion about security uploads,
> don't they?

Can someone claify if the scope for r1 updates is broader than
just security. That is, can fixes like this go into r1?
I beleive there are quite a few critical, but non-security bugs
floating around.

-- 
Horms



Reply to: