Bug#267600: kernel: Please consider including "suspend to disk" option
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 05:08:21PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Christoph Hellwig (hch@lst.de):
>
> > swusp isn't really stable enough yet. Maybe for sarge+1
>
> I wasn't hoping this for sarge, don't be afraid..:-)
>
> So, sarge+1 is a good target, imho, provided this is added to kernel
> compilation asap in order to get tested enough when we will release
> sarge+1 in 6 months..:-))
you can call it by its name now, i suppose, since it seems it will be going to
be etch. Now, 6 month seems a bit unprobably, but a year would be nice.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: