Re: kernel-source 2.6.7 packages pending upload
At some point in the past, hch wrote:
>>> Shouldn't we disable swsusp instead? The code is flakey at least and
>>> eats quite a bit of memory that seems to be scare on the boot floppies.
William Lee Irwin III writes:
>> I'd be in favor of that also.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 04:09:50PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Ah, too bad. I'm just uploading a new build that fixes kernel-tree
> (most important), fixes a few other glitches (less important), and
> moves the asfs filesystem from kernel-patch-powerpc into kernel-source
> (mostly cosmetical). I could have dropped the modular-swsusp patch if
> I had seen your message earlier.
> Anyway, if you decide to fix modular-swsusp.dpatch, please leave the
> old version in place, make changes to a copy, and put that copy in
> debian/patches/00list-3. Otherwise the building of the monolithic
> patches will fail horribly. I'll update the documentation for that as
> soon as possible.
It won't take long for a problem report to roll in to justify turning it
off in the .config anyway, so I'm not concerned if it's not immediate.
-- wli
Reply to: