Re: NMU: kernel
- To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
- Cc: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: NMU: kernel
- From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 15:31:51 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20040614143151.GA27267@deprecation.cyrius.com>
- In-reply-to: <20040524074016.GB28916@lst.de>
- References: <1YAwv-76t-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <hhekpc91l0.fsf@alsvidh.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de> <20040522111707.GA14610@pegasos> <20040522180213.GQ11346@kalmia.hozed.org> <20040522191742.GA16966@deprecation.cyrius.com> <hhn03yygwf.fsf@theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de> <20040523214647.GA21527@lst.de> <hhn03yuwdp.fsf@alsvidh.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de> <20040524074016.GB28916@lst.de>
* Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> [2004-05-24 09:40]:
> What I have in mind is a setup with daily cross-compiled kernel
> builds from the cvs repository that get uploaded in some central
> location so we a) know it builds and b) people can easily test it
> work.
I can try to get machines for this purpose; since the kernels would be
cross-compiled, the architecture doesn't really matter much, right?
> In addition night QA test runs would also be nice if get a pool of
> enough machines with serial consoles and automated reset lines
> together, we're using that with great success at SGI.
What kind of QA tests would be run? Are there any automatic tests
already we can use, apart from the LTP?
--
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com
Reply to: